IEP goal bank: measurable sample goals by domain

This is a goal bank with the warning label printed first: a bank goal is a scaffold, not a goal. IDEA requires annual goals designed to meet the child’s needs that result from the child’s disability (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)) — which no bank can know. What a good bank can give you is the anatomy: a condition, an observable behavior, a criterion, and a measurement method, assembled correctly so you can swap in your student’s baseline and numbers. Below: one labeled sample per domain, and a link to the full guide for each — every guide covers measurement methods, common write-ups, and more samples.

The anatomy every goal below follows

Given [condition] , [student] will [observable behavior] at/with [criterion] as measured by [method and schedule]. If any of the four parts is missing, data collection fails before it starts. The full breakdown — with weak-vs-strong rewrites — is in how to write measurable IEP goals, and every criterion below implies a matching data collection sheet.

Academic

Reading fluency IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given an unpracticed grade-level passage, Jayden will read aloud at 110 words correct per minute with 97% accuracy on 3 consecutive weekly probes.

Reading comprehension IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): After reading a grade-level passage, Lena will answer inferential questions with 80% accuracy across 4 of 5 biweekly probes.

Written expression IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given a picture prompt and 10 minutes, Marcus will write a paragraph containing at least 25 correct word sequences in 4 of 5 monthly writing samples.

Math IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given a 2-minute probe of mixed multiplication facts (0–9), Priya will write 40 correct digits with 3 or fewer errors on 3 consecutive weekly probes.

Behavior & social

Behavior IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): When frustrated during independent work, Sam will use a break card instead of leaving his seat in 4 of 5 observed opportunities per week, per teacher tally.

Social skills IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): During structured small-group activities, Ana will make an on-topic comment or ask a peer a question in 4 of 5 daily opportunities across 3 consecutive weeks.

Pragmatic language IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): In a 5-minute structured conversation, Theo will maintain the topic across 3 conversational turns in 8 of 10 opportunities over 4 sessions, per SLP data.

Independence & transition

Executive functioning IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given a posted checklist, Riley will begin the assigned task within 2 minutes of the direction with no more than 1 verbal prompt in 4 of 5 daily opportunities.

Functional life skills IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given a visual recipe, Deja will independently complete 8 of 10 steps of a simple meal-preparation task on 3 consecutive weekly probes, per task-analysis data.

Fine motor IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given lined paper and a visual model, Omar will write a 3-sentence response with letters correctly placed on the line in 4 of 5 weekly work samples.

Self-advocacy IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Before a quiz or test, Noor will request her listed accommodations from the teacher without prompting in 4 of 5 opportunities per grading period.

Transition / postsecondary IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): During weekly work-based learning, Caleb will follow a 3-step task sequence from a written checklist with no more than 1 prompt in 4 of 5 observed sessions.

Disability-specific collections

Autism IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given a visual schedule, Eli will transition between activities within 1 minute of the cue with no more than 1 gestural prompt in 80% of daily transitions.

ADHD IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given a 20-minute independent work block and a self-monitoring checklist, Zoe will mark her on-task status at each 5-minute chime with 80% accuracy for 3 weeks.

Dyslexia IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given 15 unfamiliar decodable two-syllable words, Owen will read them with 90% accuracy on 3 consecutive weekly probes, per teacher-recorded data.

Intellectual disability IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given a visual task analysis, Marcus will complete the 6-step handwashing sequence with no more than 1 verbal prompt in 4 of 5 daily opportunities across 3 consecutive weeks.

Emotional disturbance IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): When presented with corrective feedback, Ava will respond with a taught coping strategy rather than leaving the room in 80% of observed opportunities across 4 consecutive weeks.

Anxiety IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): When given a private signal or self-identifying rising anxiety, Priya will initiate a taught regulation strategy within 1 minute in 4 of 5 observed opportunities across 3 consecutive weeks, per teacher data sheet.

Non-verbal students / AAC IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Across school settings, Sam will use his AAC device to request, comment, or protest at least 8 times per day, averaged weekly, across 4 consecutive weeks.

Preschool (ages 3–5) IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): During snack and center time, when a desired item is out of reach, Leo will request it using a two-word phrase, sign, or his AAC device in 8 of 10 observed opportunities across 3 consecutive weekly observations.

Reading sub-skills and post-school

Decoding / phonics IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): Given 20 CVCe words in isolation, Nia will read them with 90% accuracy across 3 consecutive weekly probes, per teacher-recorded data.

Vocational IEP goals →

Sample goal (invented, for illustration): During a 30-minute school-based work task, Devon will complete assigned units at 80% of the established rate with no more than 1 redirection in 4 of 5 sessions.

Why copy-paste fails an audit

File reviewers read goals against the present levels. A goal whose baseline doesn’t appear in the PLAAFP, whose criterion jumps from nowhere, or whose wording matches three other students’ IEPs word-for-word reads as non-individualized — the exact thing §300.320(a)(2) exists to prevent. The fix is a four-step adaptation, not a rewrite from scratch: (1) replace the baseline with the student’s own from collected baseline data; (2) keep the verb only if it matches what the student actually needs to do; (3) set the criterion one realistic year from the baseline, not at the bank’s default; (4) name a measurement method someone on your team will actually run weekly. Ten minutes per goal, and the bank did its job without leaving fingerprints.

FAQ

Is it okay to use goals from an IEP goal bank?

As a starting point, yes — as a finished goal, no. IDEA requires measurable annual goals designed to meet the needs that result from the child's disability (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)), which means every goal has to be anchored to that student's present levels and baseline data. A bank goal becomes defensible when you replace its baseline, criterion, timeline, and measurement method with the student's own.

What makes an IEP goal measurable?

Four parts: a condition (given what materials, setting, or support), an observable behavior (a verb you can see or count — read, write, initiate, remain), a criterion (the number that defines success — accuracy, rate, duration, prompt level), and a measurement method (how and how often data is collected). If a stranger couldn't collect data on the goal tomorrow from the goal sentence alone, it isn't measurable yet.

How many goals should an IEP have?

IDEA sets no number — the IEP needs a goal for each area of need identified in the present levels, and no goals it can't staff and measure. In practice most IEPs run 3–8 annual goals. More goals than the team can collect data on is a compliance risk, not a sign of rigor: every goal carries the §300.320(a)(3) duty to measure and report progress.

Where do the sample goals on this page come from?

They're invented samples written for illustration, labeled as such, following the condition–behavior–criterion–measurement anatomy. None of them should be pasted into a real IEP without rebuilding the baseline, criterion, and measurement around the actual student.